There's also the communal nature of going to a theater that can't really be reproduced even by a small gathering in your home. Maybe the OP should watch more documentaries and learn about the importance of Education, Science, Art because without out THOSE he wouldn't probably wouldn't even have a computer to type on, or the internet to whine about "Theaters are dead so movies can live again." There is nothing special about movies OVER any other art form - movies AUGMENT other art forms. You know what ALSO is good? Art: People expressing their infinite creativity to inspire you think about a different perspective.
Zohan screenit movie#
Watching the latest "blockbuster" fad movie will be all but forgotten in a few years. Today, a student of a developed nation can learn a summary of the past few thousands years of Mathematics, Philosophy, English, Physics, etc. Because without the ability to read or write this dingleberry couldn't even communicate his feelings to others. That's a colossal waste of time and talent. Of those I would only say around 14 were any good - 100 * 14 / 704 = 1.988% were worth watching which means the OTHER 98% of movies were meh, bad, or out right garbage.
Zohan screenit tv#
Not to mention the TV shows Star Trek, and all of the various spin-offs, inspired a LOT of people to get into Science. Anyone who read the classic Sci-Fi of Asimov, Clarke, Heinlein didn't need a movie to enjoy them. At least with books kids were not only "forced" to but inspired to, use their imagination. What makes _this_ particular art form "good" ? Playing devil's advocate I could even see how it could be argued, quite successfully, that society would be better off without movies. This begging the question fallacy is a horrible way to start any conversation. > Movies are, by their very nature, good. Whether that means being able to pause for bathroom and snack breaks, having the option to just switch the film if you don't like what you're seeing, or being able to return to something over a period of time, watching at home can not only be as good as watching in a theater - it can be better.Įxactly.
Zohan screenit full#
A fairly cheap, big-screen 4K TV, and an accompanying surround sound setup will put you right back in the theater recliner, except you have full control over the experience.
![zohan screenit zohan screenit](https://s.pacn.ws/720/7u/pa.141477.1.jpg)
For me, it starts with the basic reality that a truly epic film-watching experience can now be had in your house, with all the big-screen bombast and overwhelming audio that theaters have long touted as their domain alone. There are myriad contributors to this realization. This pandemic has made us all take a long, hard look at what has really been working for humanity and what hasn't, and I think the theater experience - at least the massive, multi-screen one we've been living with - might be dying at just the right time. But over the last two decades or so, the movie-going experience has been degraded by turns, both in terms of the physical reality of packing hundreds of people into a shared experience with a world of increasing distractions, and in the quality of the "blockbuster" fare being peddled by studios. We've probably all had formative experiences in one way or another around movies, and for many of us those experiences took place in a classic multiplex, surrounded by other like-minded film fans.
Movies are one of the best things to have happened to the human race, probably ranking right up there in the top 5 with eating, sex, indoor plumbing, and music. Joshua Topolsky, writing at Input Mag: Movies are, by their very nature, good.